If the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only carried out When the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence as well as the petitioner company responded to the allegations as such they were well aware about the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to get seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by law." It's well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is really a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In the event the parents with the boy or girl usually do not approve of these types of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they might do if they are able to cut off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or guy that is a major, the pair is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives this sort of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings via the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against this sort of person(s) as provided by legislation.
Sign up for E-mail Notification of new opinions The cases listed underneath have experienced opinions filed for them within the last 14 times. The following information is available for Every single case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, like signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.
thirteen . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some size, both parties have agreed towards the disposal of the moment petition over the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner together with private respondents and will consider care of the many aspects of the case and be certain that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand"—would be the principle by which judges are bound to these past decisions, drawing on established judicial authority to formulate their positions.
Summaries offer a concise insight into the realm of dispute resolution outside traditional court proceedings. In Pakistan, arbitration serves as a significant alternative for resolving commercial conflicts swiftly and efficiently.
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is usually a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents of your boy or Woman do not approve of these types of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they are able to do if they might Lower here off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male who's a major, the pair is neither harassed by anybody nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to activity by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against these kinds of persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by law.
10. Without touching the merits of your case in the issue of once-a-year increases in the pensionary emoluments on the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of the provincial government, this sort of once-a-year increase, if permissible in the case of employees of KMC, needs further assessment to generally be made with the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance due to funding issues and insufficient adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, necessitating the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle recognized by a court, which other courts are obligated to stick to.
The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The presence of this power casts an obligation on the police, they usually must bear in mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its numerous pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are needed to protect and not abduct. Read more
The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information for being gathered via the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there can be one particular or more judgments specified (or reported). Only the reason for the decision in the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all could possibly be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning can be adopted within an argument.
Criminal cases In the common law tradition, courts decide the law applicable into a case by interpreting statutes and implementing precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Not like most civil legislation systems, common law systems Keep to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their possess previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all decreased courts should make decisions consistent with the previous decisions of higher courts.